Political Settlements and Revenue Bargains in Africa
InfoStart date: 1 August, 2016 End date: 31 July, 2022 Project type: Research collaboration projects in Danida priority countries (Window 1) Project code: 16-03-AU Countries: Tanzania Uganda Thematic areas: State building, governance and civil society, Lead institution: Aarhus University (AU), Denmark Aarhus University (AU), Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Denmark Aarhus University (AU), Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Political Science, Denmark Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Denmark Makarere University, School of Law REPOA, Policy Research for Development, Tanzania Project website: go to website Project coordinator: Anne Mette Kjær Total grant: 7,284,756 DKK
Over the last decade, a number of countries in Africa have become less dependent on traditional aid as other sources of income have grown. At the same time, the policy priorities of these countries’ governments may be changing. Whereas poverty reduction and social service provision were highly prioritized around the turn of the millennium, focus is shifting towards infrastructure and industrial policy. Declining aid dependence and more country ownership over policy are clearly desirable. However, we know little about how the changes in the composition of revenue providers affect bargaining over revenue and ultimately, public policy. Revenue bargaining processes are inherently political. They are affected by the countries’ political settlements and electoral pressures. This proposed research builds research capacity through exploring how formal and informal revenue bargains affect public policies. As a joint team of legal experts, political scientists, sociologists and economists, we provide policy-relevant understanding of the political economy of tax and revenue bargaining in least developed countries, and Uganda and Tanzania specifically. Our main hypothesis is that changes in the relative power of revenue providers will lead to a change in the policy priorities of national governments. We explore this by combining a macro-historical comparative study of Uganda and Tanzania over time with a micro-level study of the politics of specific instances of revenue bargaining.